Skip to main content
The Daily Wollongong

Wollongong news, every day

News

The Numbers Behind Wollongong's Duplicate Image Problem: What the Data Tells Us

A surge in duplicated digital images across council records, real estate listings and heritage databases is costing the Illawarra region time, storage and money — and the figures are harder to ignore than ever.

By Wollongong News Desk · Published 5 July 2026, 4:45 am · Updated

3 min read

Thousands of duplicate digital images are clogging the records systems used by Wollongong City Council, local real estate agencies and heritage bodies across the Illawarra, with technology auditors finding that redundant image files can account for anywhere between 20 and 40 percent of total storage consumption in unmanaged document archives. The problem has a name — duplicate image replacement — and, increasingly, a price tag.

The issue has sharpened in 2026 because several major Wollongong institutions are mid-way through large-scale digital migrations. BlueScope Steel's Port Kembla operations, the University of Wollongong's library and research systems, and the Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District have all announced or commenced platform transitions in the past 18 months. Each migration carries the same risk: copying files across systems without deduplication checks multiplies redundant images exponentially.

What the Storage Numbers Actually Look Like

For context, a single uncompressed architectural photograph of a heritage building on Crown Street — the kind routinely filed during development applications — can run to 25 megabytes. Multiply that across hundreds of DA submissions lodged at Wollongong City Council's Burelli Street offices each year, and the storage burden compounds fast. Industry benchmarks published by the Australian Information Management Association suggest local government bodies in regional NSW spend an average of $18,000 to $45,000 annually on cloud storage overruns tied directly to unmanaged file duplication.

Real estate is another pressure point. Along the Illawarra corridor from Thirroul to Shellharbour, agencies uploading property listings to platforms such as realestate.com.au and Domain routinely generate between three and seven duplicate versions of each listing image — different crops, resolutions and watermark variants — without any automated reconciliation. A mid-sized agency handling 60 active listings at any one time could be carrying more than 1,500 redundant image files at peak. At current AWS S3 pricing of roughly $0.025 per gigabyte per month, the dollar amounts are modest in isolation, but compounded across dozens of operators, they are not trivial.

The University of Wollongong's Research Data Repository, housed within the Wollongong campus on Northfields Avenue, faces a related but distinct version of the problem. Academic datasets — particularly those tied to environmental monitoring of the Illawarra escarpment and Port Kembla's industrial air quality program — frequently incorporate repeat-capture imagery from drone surveys. Without hash-matching deduplication tools applied at ingestion, a single six-month monitoring project can generate file libraries where 30 percent of stored images are functional duplicates of earlier captures.

Deduplication Tools and What Replacing Duplicates Actually Costs

Replacing or reconciling duplicate images is not simply a matter of deleting files. Automated deduplication software — tools like Duplicate Cleaner Pro, Adobe Bridge's batch-match function, or enterprise platforms used by large councils — requires staff time for setup, rule configuration and exception handling. The Australian Local Government Association has previously noted that remediation projects of this kind in mid-sized councils typically run between $12,000 and $80,000 depending on archive size, though those figures predate the current wave of AI-assisted image-matching tools that have reduced labour costs significantly since 2024.

Wollongong City Council's digital records team, based at the civic administration building on Burelli Street, declined to provide specific storage figures when contacted Friday. The Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, which manages imaging records across Wollongong Hospital and the Shellharbour Hospital campus, similarly did not respond to questions before deadline.

For smaller operators — the heritage groups, the suburban real estate offices, the not-for-profit community organisations running archives out of places like the Wollongong City Gallery on Burelli Street — the practical advice is straightforward. Audit before migration. Most free tools, including Google's duplicate finder within Photos and the open-source dupeGuru, can scan a 100-gigabyte image library in under 40 minutes and flag matches with better than 95 percent accuracy. Doing that work before a cloud migration, rather than after, can cut storage costs by a third. In a regional economy watching every line item, that is not an abstraction — it is a quarterly invoice.

Spread the word

See something wrong? Suggest a correction.

Have your say

Loading comments…

Sources

About this article

Published by The Daily Wollongong

This article was produced by the The Daily Wollongong editorial desk and covers news in Wollongong. See our editorial standards for how we use AI.

The Daily Wollongong brief

The day's Wollongong news in a 2-minute read, every weekday morning. Free.

Join 2,847 locals getting The Daily Wollongong every morning in Wollongong.

By subscribing you agree to receive emails from The Daily Wollongong and accept our Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

Daily brief

Enjoyed this? Wake up to Wollongong news every morning.

Free, in your inbox before 7am. Weekdays.

Join 2,847 locals getting The Daily Wollongong every morning in Wollongong.

By subscribing you agree to receive emails from The Daily Wollongong and accept our Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

Stay in the loop

Enjoyed this story? Get tomorrow's briefing free.