policy
Wollongong's independent planning panels: what the Keira Street decision means for city growth
How the Wollongong Local Planning Panel and a recent Land and Environment Court ruling shape development decisions that affect local jobs, housing and infrastructure.
How we reported this

For Wollongong residents, the path a development application takes from submission to approval can feel opaque. But under the current system, elected councillors have no say on most applications; that responsibility falls to council staff or, for regionally significant or high-interest proposals, to independent panels. The Wollongong Local Planning Panel (WLPP), which replaced the former Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel in 2020, was established to increase transparency and integrity in the planning assessment process, acting as an independent hearing forum for both applicants and objectors.
The WLPP's decisions are grounded in the Wollongong Local Environmental Plan (LEP) 2009, alongside assessments of environmental impact, public interest and expert advice from engineers and other specialists. A notable recent case was the Land and Environment Court's November 2025 ruling on a 7-storey shop-top housing development at 101-113 Keira Street, Wollongong. The court upheld a consent that allowed variations to building height and separation standards, a decision that sets a precedent for similar mixed-use projects in the city centre.
What this means for local jobs and housing
This system directly affects the daily lives of Wollongong residents. Mixed-use developments, like the 11-storey building at Corrimal Street, which received unanimous approval from the WLPP, bring new housing above retail or commercial spaces, providing the kind of infill development that can support local businesses and create construction jobs. For workers, these projects mean more places to live near employment hubs, reducing commute times. For the local economy, more residents in the city centre supports cafes, shops and services.
The Keira Street decision also underscores the importance of the independent panel model. When the WLPP approves a development, it weighs the proposal against the LEP 2009, environmental standards and expert reports, such as those from floodplain engineers. This process is designed to balance growth with community and environmental concerns, a critical balance for a city like Wollongong that is managing pressure for more housing while protecting its coastal and escarpment setting.
Consolidating the rulebook
Meanwhile, the council is moving to simplify the planning framework. Amendment No 15 to the Wollongong LEP 2009 proposes repealing the separate Wollongong (West Dapto) LEP 2010 and consolidating everything into a single Principal LEP covering the entire local government area. This change, if adopted, would make it easier for residents, developers and council staff to navigate the rules that govern what can be built and where, a practical benefit for anyone involved in a DA, whether they are a homeowner planning an extension or a developer proposing a larger project.
For Wollongong residents, the upshot is that the independent panel system, while not without its critics, provides a structured, evidence-based pathway for developments that shape the city's skyline and streets. The Keira Street decision, the Corrimal Street approval, and the ongoing consolidation of the LEP all point to a planning system that is evolving to meet the city's need for more housing and economic activity, without sacrificing the local character and environmental standards that make Wollongong a place people want to live.