Thank you for your patience. Some pages may be slower than usual while we make improvements behind the scenes.

Tuesday 21 July 2026
Beta
The Daily Wollongong

Wollongong Local News · Every Day

news

How Wollongong's Property Listings Got Flooded With Fake Photos, And Why It Took Years to Fix

The trail of duplicate and AI-generated real estate images clogging Illawarra property portals runs back further than most buyers realise.

By Wollongong News Desk · Published 5 July 2026

How we reported this

Produced with AI assistance and reviewed against our editorial standards. Sources are linked where available. Spotted an error or need a correction? Contact [email protected].

How Wollongong's Property Listings Got Flooded With Fake Photos, And Why It Took Years to Fix
Photo by Altaf Shah on Pexels

Wollongong City Council confirmed this week it had formally written to the Real Estate Institute of NSW calling for mandatory image-authenticity standards on property listings across the Illawarra region, a response to a problem that has been quietly building since at least 2022. The trigger: a surge in duplicate and digitally manipulated listing photos that have misled buyers from Fairy Meadow to Shellharbour, in some cases disguising flood-prone lots or masking structural defects behind stock-library sunsets.

The timing matters. The Illawarra property market has been under intense pressure for three years running. Median house prices in Wollongong hit $920,000 in the March 2026 quarter, according to CoreLogic data, up from $780,000 in early 2023. Buyers, many of them priced out of Sydney and hunting remotely via platforms like realestate.com.au and Domain, are making six-figure decisions based on thumbnail images viewed on a phone screen. That vulnerability created the conditions for image fraud to flourish.

The mechanics are straightforward. A selling agent, or, increasingly, a third-party marketing vendor, uploads a hero photograph of a property. Image-scraping tools then harvest that photo and repurpose it in listings for different addresses, sometimes suburbs apart. One documented case from late 2024 involved a photograph of a renovated kitchen on Corrimal Street, Wollongong, appearing simultaneously in listings for two separate properties: one in West Wollongong and another in Dapto. Neither buyer realised the image was recycled until after they had attended inspections.

Where the System Broke Down

The roots of the problem stretch back to the pandemic-era listing boom of 2021 and 2022, when agents were processing unprecedented volumes of stock with reduced staffing. Several large franchise offices across the Illawarra, including operations along Crown Street in the Wollongong CBD, began outsourcing photo editing and listing uploads to overseas virtual assistant services. Quality control, never formally mandated under NSW Fair Trading's existing rules, effectively collapsed.

At the same time, generative AI tools became cheap and accessible. By mid-2023, services that could replace a cloudy sky, insert a swimming pool, or entirely fabricate a garden view cost as little as $15 per image through subscription platforms. The University of Wollongong's Smart Infrastructure Facility flagged the issue in an internal research note circulated to local council in November 2023, warning that image manipulation in property marketing was outpacing the regulatory framework by years. That note did not result in any immediate policy action.

Consumer complaints to NSW Fair Trading about misleading real estate imagery rose 34 percent between 2023 and 2025, though the agency has not broken those figures down by region. Locally, the Illawarra Tenants' Advice and Advocacy Service says it began fielding calls specifically about photo misrepresentation from prospective buyers, not just renters, from around March 2024.

What Comes Next for Illawarra Buyers

Council's letter to REINSW requests that all listing images uploaded to major portals carry a metadata timestamp and a disclosure flag indicating whether any digital alteration has occurred beyond standard brightness or contrast adjustment. It also asks the institute to consider requiring agents to retain original unedited files for a minimum of 12 months after a sale settles, a standard already applied in parts of the United Kingdom.

REINSW has 60 days to respond. In the interim, buyer advocates operating in the Illawarra market recommend several practical steps: request the original, unedited photo files directly from the selling agent before any offer, run hero images through a reverse-image search tool such as Google Lens, and always cross-reference listed features against the council's publicly available Section 10.7 planning certificate for the address. The certificate, accessible through Wollongong City Council's online portal for a $53 fee, will not show you a fake kitchen, but it will show you the flood overlay the photo was designed to distract you from.

The broader regulatory fix, if it comes, will take time. Until REINSW or NSW Fair Trading act, the burden of verification sits squarely with buyers navigating a market that shows no sign of cooling down.

References Sourced but Not Limited to:

Beta · AI-assisted · human oversight

Your newsroom. Shaped by you.

The Daily Wollongong is in beta. AI may assist with research, summarising and drafting. Automated checks assess sourcing, accuracy and editorial risk before publication, and sensitive material is held for human review. Spotted something off, or want us covering a topic? Tell us. Your feedback is entirely optional and helps shape what we publish next.

The Daily Network · local news across AUS